_
|
|
Thierrybazzanella.com - Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change

|
List Price: $16.95
Our Price: $11.53
Your Save: $ 5.42 ( 32% )
Availability: Not yet published
Manufacturer: Broadway
|
Average Customer Rating:     

|
|
Binding: Paperback Dewey Decimal Number: 900 EAN: 9780767917186 ISBN: 0767917189 Label: Broadway Manufacturer: Broadway Number Of Items: 1 Number Of Pages: 512 Publication Date: 2009-05-12 Publisher: Broadway Release Date: 2009-05-12 Studio: Broadway
|
|
|
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
|
“Fascists,” “Brownshirts,” “jackbooted stormtroopers”—such are the insults typically hurled at conservatives by their liberal opponents. Calling someone a fascist is the fastest way to shut them up, defining their views as beyond the political pale. But who are the real fascists in our midst?
Liberal Fascism offers a startling new perspective on the theories and practices that define fascist politics. Replacing conveniently manufactured myths with surprising and enlightening research, Jonah Goldberg reminds us that the original fascists were really on the left, and that liberals from Woodrow Wilson to FDR to Hillary Clinton have advocated policies and principles remarkably similar to those of Hitler's National Socialism and Mussolini's Fascism.
Contrary to what most people think, the Nazis were ardent socialists (hence the term “National socialism”). They believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free market, provided generous pensions for the elderly, and maintained a strict racial quota system in their universities—where campus speech codes were all the rage. The Nazis led the world in organic farming and alternative medicine. Hitler was a strict vegetarian, and Himmler was an animal rights activist.
Do these striking parallels mean that today’s liberals are genocidal maniacs, intent on conquering the world and imposing a new racial order? Not at all. Yet it is hard to deny that modern progressivism and classical fascism shared the same intellectual roots. We often forget, for example, that Mussolini and Hitler had many admirers in the United States. W.E.B. Du Bois was inspired by Hitler's Germany, and Irving Berlin praised Mussolini in song. Many fascist tenets were espoused by American progressives like John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson, and FDR incorporated fascist policies in the New Deal.
Fascism was an international movement that appeared in different forms in different countries, depending on the vagaries of national culture and temperament. In Germany, fascism appeared as genocidal racist nationalism. In America, it took a “friendlier,” more liberal form. The modern heirs of this “friendly fascist” tradition include the New York Times, the Democratic Party, the Ivy League professoriate, and the liberals of Hollywood. The quintessential Liberal Fascist isn't an SS storm trooper; it is a female grade school teacher with an education degree from Brown or Swarthmore.
These assertions may sound strange to modern ears, but that is because we have forgotten what fascism is. In this angry, funny, smart, contentious book, Jonah Goldberg turns our preconceptions inside out and shows us the true meaning of Liberal Fascism.
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:      Summary: A "Must Read" Comment: This is a must read. Buy copies for your parents and for your kids. READ IT and spread the word. A
Customer Rating:      Summary: Finally Comment: As a conservative, I have always heard that the far right was like Hitlars Germany. In my own ignroance, I never bothered to dispute the notion as it was the accepted norm.
However as I became more interested in Politics, it began to really concern me as to why the supposed link to Fascism was there. As I read more and more about Fascism, I could see not a single link to conservatives or anything "right wing". In fact, it was the opposite and I saw much of the modern day DNC party positions aligned with that of Nazi Germany.
This book built on what I was learning with far more details than I had dug up. It also helped explain more into WHY the Fascist were labeled as "right wing" to really help me put Fascism in context with Socialism and Communism.
If you are not convinced that Fascism is on the far left, then please take a look at the policy. In fact just look at Obama and the plans he has... it is almost mirrored of Nazi Germany.
Customer Rating:      Summary: You Have to Read It to Believe It Comment: Contrary to popular liberal belief, this is not an Ann Coulter-esque "junk food for the conservative soul," as the prolific and excellent reviewer David McCune labeled Coulter's "Godless." Nor is it really a polemic, or a salvo of any kind. Its tone is overwhelmingly deferential and cautious, with small moments of academic triumphalism.
The book is not really filled with "startling" new information or insights, either. Those who have been paying attention and have studied, independently or in increasingly remote conservative institutions, the direction and tone of world politics in the last century will not be surprised by the themes and conclusions of this book, with the exception of the occasional anecdote.
The problem is that most Americans (for whom this book is intended, clearly) are educated in the slop-mush nonsense of the very progressivism that Goldberg rightly calls fascistic. Which means that they have accepted a false dichotomy at the heart of modern political systems: communism and fascism. Tom Wolfe rightly notes this in the blurb on the back of the hardcover edition: "In the greatest hoax of modern history, Russia's ruling 'socialist workers party,' the Communists, established themselves as the polar opposites of their two socialist clones, the National Socialist German Workers Party (quicknamed 'the Nazis') and Italy's Marxist-inspired Fascisti, by branding them both as 'the fascists.' Jonah Goldberg is the first historian to detail the havoc this spin of all spins has played upon Western thought for the past seventy-five years, very much including the present moment."
George Orwell, in his famous essay "Politics and the English Language," noted that politics brings about the lumping of all words into 'good' and 'bad' camps: "The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies 'something not desirable.'"
Lev Navrozov, a Soviet dissident writer, wrote in his book "The Education of Lev Navrozov" of the "manichean coparticipative imagination" of the leftists who seized Russia in 1917. He wrote, "Communists... believe that (the word?) communism is better than (the word?) fascism because the former word belongs to the cluster of good words and the latter to that of bad words..."
Similarly, in the modern liberal mind: religious, reactionary, conservative, racist, fascist. Ironically, for the true ideologues of modern liberalism, this book can only be a faulty chain of connections: liberal, progressive, vegetarian, forward-thinking, eugenicist, fascist, etc.
But if they would only read it with an open mind, they might be able to take a thought-formulation or two from some liberal hero like Noam Chomsky and see it extended to its natural conclusion. Yes, Woodrow Wilson stirred up the masses to support the war through fascist control of corporations and the news media, as both Chomsky and Goldberg note often. But fascist control, inherently, has a lot more to do with control, generally, than war, specifically, as Goldberg, but not Chomsky, rightly notes.
Chomsky is pathetically lost in the mindset of Vietnam-era anti-war activism, which totally fails to recognize its own fascist tendencies. Thus, only the call to physical, blood-and-guts war (for the profit of defense corporations, of course) can be fascistic. Goldberg takes this a hundred steps further to the "moral equivalent of war" (William James' formulation), which is at the root of progressive follies like Hilary Clinton's "politics of meaning" and Al Gore's all-encompassing, earth-shattering, extortionist theory of anthropogenic "global warming."
And even though it's not the main point, it's nice to see Goldberg dredge up the left's constant ingratiation to "men of power," from Lenin to Hitler to Mussolini to Stalin to Mao to Castro, whitewashed by the leftists from history as soon as their crimes are no longer "defensible."
This is an ambitious book, because it aims to make a very detailed historical argument in defense of a very simple thesis, in the face of everything-- thousands and thousands of books and articles and television commentators-- that make the opposite argument, often using the very same historical evidence. I think the book does quite a good job of this.
The only criticism I would make is that the book spends very little time addressing the question of why it is that the world's conception of fascism, the accepted definition in academia, the media, and political discourse, is so wrong. It happily makes its simple claim and clearly brings forward the evidence to support it. But one is left with a feeling of desperation: why, oh why, is this such a difficult pill for us to swallow?
The answer, I think, lies in that Soviet "spin of spins" that kept on spinning through the Cold War and beyond, a reality which is far more unpleasant and even harder to swallow than the fact that progressive liberalism and fascism are very nearly the same thing and share many principles and assumptions. But strictly speaking, this is not the topic at hand and it is outside the scope of this book.
In conclusion, "Liberal Fascism" is an ambitious work which while being intended for consumption far and wide, is something greater than mere fuel for the conservative vs. liberal fire. Considering myself sophisticated and magnanimous, I nevertheless have no shame in recommending it "liberally." It is no guilty pleasure.
Customer Rating:      Summary: Horrible Book Comment: This book tries to present biased political attacks as historic fact. His presentation fails to consider how fascist ideas have influenced the entire history of thought beyond the liberalist thread. Finally, his attack on Hillary Clinton betrays any feigned attempt at maintaining a position of academic neutrality.
Customer Rating:      Summary: A Very Well Argued Book Comment: Jonah Goldberg makes his case very well. Connections between progressive thought in America and fascism in Europe are shown on several levels, to include (but not limited to) the following: state welfare programs, wars on smoking, radical environmentalism, attacks on the family, and attempts to subvert traditional Christianity. As an alternative to fascism, Goldberg suggest a return to what he terms "classical liberalism" -- the intellectual tradition of individual liberty found in America's founding ideas and in thinkers such as Burke and Adam Smith.
While Goldberg presents his case well, it would have been helpful to include more of an affirmative case for classical liberalism and to explore its origins more fully. Dinesh D'Souza has noted in his book 'What's So Great About Christianity' that the Declaration of Independence idea that it's "self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights" can't be understood outside of a Christian context, because "there's no other source for such rights," D'Souza notes. It would have been helpful to include a discussion such as this.
Overall though, Goldberg's book succeeds well and prompts you to want to think and read more. He cites Lutheran Scholar Gene Edward Veith's book 'Modern Fascism: The Threat to the Judeo-Christian Worldview' a couple of times. That's now on my list of books to buy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_
|
| Copyright -
thierrybazzanella.com | |